Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Limestone microporosity is ubiquitous and extensively developed in most Phanerozoic limestones. From an economic perspective, microporosity is important because it contributes substantially to the carbonate pore system, which can host significant volumes of water and hydrocarbons. Therefore, determining the presence and distribution of limestone micropores is necessary for accurate hydrocarbon estimations, reservoir characterization, and fluid flow simulations. From an academic standpoint, microporosity is important because its genesis is intimately linked with the mineralogical stabilization of metastable sediments, a fundamental process in carbonate diagenesis. Many types of micropores contribute to what has been referred to as microporosity, but the vast majority is hosted among low-magnesium calcite (LMC) microcrystals that are present in limestone matrix and allochems. Geochemical, textural, and mineralogical data from natural settings and laboratory experiments indicate that LMC microcrystals are diagenetic in origin. More specifically, these data support a diagenetic model of mineralogical stabilization that involves dissolution of precursor sediments dominated by aragonite and high-magnesium calcite (HMC) minerals, and precipitation of LMC microcrystal cements. The stabilization process is inferred to take place in the meteoric, marine, and burial diagenetic realms. Although it has not been directly observed, carbon and oxygen isotopes, as well as trace element data suggest that LMC microcrystals form during burial diagenesis in marine-like fluids. Evidence suggests that porosity is not generated during this dissolution-precipitation process, but rather inherited from the precursor sediments. The final arrangement of the micropores in a limestone, however, depends on the precise diagenetic pathway. LMC microcrystals exhibit a range of microcrystalline textures that are classified on the basis of crystal morphology and size. The three main textural classes - granular (framework), fitted (mosaic), and clustered - have been recognized across a wide range of ages, depositional settings, burial depths, and precursor types, and are characterized by distinct petrophysical properties, such as porosity, permeability, and pore-throat size. Observations from modern sediments also support the hypothesis that LMC microcrystals develop from aragonite and HMC dominated lime mud. The origin of lime mud has been extensively studied but still highly debated. Of particular interest to the discussion of microporosity are proposed secular variations in the dominant mineralogy of carbonate sediments through the Phanerozoic. Microporous limestones comprised of LMC microcrystals are equally abundant during times of aragonite seas and calcite seas, which suggests that no special mineral precursor is required. Microporous textures are also observed in deep marine chalks where micropores are hosted between chalk constituents. Unlike shallow marine limestones, deep marine sediments start out as mostly LMC therefore mineralogical stabilization is not a significant process in chalk diagenesis.more » « less
-
Abstract Recent changes in US oceanographic assets are impacting scientists' ability to access seafloor and sub‐seafloor materials and thus constraining progress on science critical for societal needs. Here we identify national infrastructure needs to address critical science questions. This commentary reports on community‐driven discussions that took place during the 3‐dayFUTURE of US Seafloor Sampling Capabilities 2024 Workshop, which used an “all‐hands‐on‐deck” approach to assess seafloor and sub‐seafloor sampling requirements of a broad range of scientific objectives, focusing on capabilities that could be supported through the US Academic Research Fleet (US‐ARF) now or in the near future. Cross‐cutting issues identified included weight and size limitations in the over‐boarding capabilities of the US‐ARF, a need to access material at depths greater than ∼20 m below the seafloor, sampling capabilities at the full range of ocean depths, technologies required for precise navigation‐guided sampling and drilling, resources to capitalize on the research potential of returned materials, and workforce development.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
